Learn what to say back to your doctor when they suggest mammograms. Check out the article we found over at The Truth About Cancer.
https://youtu.be/L6rrUK54lvg
Dr. Ben Johnson: I wrote a book for women, The Secret of Health Breast Wisdom because we, as a medical society, are giving women breast cancer with our demanding that they get mammograms. Mammograms cause breast cancer. Period. So mammograms are not healthy for women. Women should not be getting routine mammograms. That’s crystal clear, published in the peer review literature.
And yet today, if a woman went to her gynaecologist or family doc, she would have this shoved down her throat, extreme coercion to go get this mammogram that is causing breast cancer. It’s not saving lives. You have a 4% increased risk of dying if you get mammograms, period.
Ty Bollinger: So the detection technique that we’re using, the primary technique that we use to detect breast cancer, is causing breast cancer.
Dr. Ben Johnson: Absolutely, it’s a terrible test; you know smashing women’s breasts and then irradiating with cancer-causing radiation. And then it’s so insensitive. For women under 50, it’s only like 52% effective, sensitive. That means 52 is pretty close to 50, right?
Ty Bollinger:Yeah.
Dr. Ben Johnson: So about half. That means that half the women that have breast cancer, it would not detect their cancer. That’s a terrible test. And so there are much better tests. And yet this is what’s still being crammed down women’s throats today. Terrible test, causes breast cancer.
Ty Bollinger:And it doesn’t detect, it detects 50% and causes cancer. You said there were better options. What better options are there for detecting breast cancer?
Dr. Ben Johnson: Well there’s two better options. If you’ve got a lump, if you think you’ve got something, ultrasound is great. It’s a test of anatomy. Mammograms are tests of anatomy. Ultrasounds are tests of anatomy. MRIs are tests of anatomy. So if you’ve already got a lump, you want a test of anatomy.
So, that would be like an ultrasound because they can see the lump, they can see its consistency. They can see where there’s calcium in it. And they can look at blood flow because tumors are going to have increased blood flow. So, for instance, a sensitivity of ultrasound is up around 80%. It’s much higher than mammograms. And the sensitivity is higher too.
But if you’re looking about prevention, if you’re talking about screening, there’s really only one device out there and that is thermography. An infrared thermal camera. Nothing touches the lady. Nothing smashes her breasts. There’s no cancer causing radiation.
As we sit here, we are omitting heat in the spectrum called infrared. There’s infrared, visual, and ultraviolet. So this is the infrared spectrum of light, which our eyes don’t see, but which is very detectable by the camera. The military developed this so that they could see people sneaking at them at nighttime and so that they could shoot down missiles and things because they’re producing heat.
Next Article: The Fruit That Kills Diabetes & Stops The Spread Of Breast Cancer
Read full article: Video – Mammograms Cause Breast Cancer
Eva Lahonen
Jan 26. 2016
Don’t listen
Jena Wozniuk Cowan
Jan 26. 2016
Sandra Melton
Claudette Enslen Metcalf
Jan 26. 2016
Seriously, this is ridiculous
Sandra Melton
Jan 26. 2016
Now I just have to get off my button and get one.
Aida Baboudjian
Jan 27. 2016
Thanks for sharing Nare jan,
Rosemary Cutbush
Jan 27. 2016
Not something I worry about. Haven’t been to a Doctor in over 2 years, since I went grain free and got healthy.
Cheryl Viers
Jan 28. 2016
My Dr told me I didn’t need to get a mammogram or Pap test every year anymore unless I have a history of cancer. Doctors that have you come back every year are gouging you for money.
Walter Hollick
Jan 28. 2016
Check out Ty Bolingers book cancer:step outside the box. I read another article that stated 65/100 oncologists would not take chemo or radiation if diagnosed because they said it doesn’t work. The treatments were designed to make money. Further research shows that cancer cells cannot survive in an alkaline environment. Keep the body alkaline like it’s supposed to be and you close the door on all cancers.
Shirley Turgeon
Jan 29. 2016
I have always personally felt that squeezing your breasts was not a good thing and I don’t agree with mammograms. I also am very sceptical about chemo. The horrible stories about the effects of chemo outweigh the pros touted about the procedure. I lost a very dear friend to breast cancer several years ago. She was only 42. They operated, operated again because they didn’t get it all then put her thru chemo. She lived for about 4 more years-but-she spent those 4 years constantly going to doctors (out of town) as the cancer just kept spreading thru her whole body. She did not have a life those 4 years. No thank you. If diagnosed I would opt to let nature take its course.
Susan Gray Adams
Feb 04. 2016
They cause cancer. So much radiation directly into the breast
Beth Hill Ross
Feb 07. 2016
Thermography!! And ultrasound if necessary…
http://www.facebook.com/groups/1120264538013507
Trisha Lieben Fadeff
Jan 11. 2018
Look in my record, you have the thermography report on my breast health. I don’t need a mammogram.
Debbie Fisher
Jan 11. 2018
No thank you. My answer for over 20 yrs.
Nancy Heck Michelli
Jan 11. 2018
Me too.
Jamie Simmons
Jan 11. 2018
I said no thank you and say that repeatedly every year.
Andee Woodell
Jan 11. 2018
Is the thermography the 3 d one.
Trisha Lieben Fadeff
Jan 12. 2018
NO. It is not radiation. It is evaluation through study of heat that reveals so much more than a mammogram can do, like toxicity in the body. Your insurance won’t cover the minimal cost of about $200,
Chrissy Farris-White
Jan 12. 2018
Thermography all of the way!